切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 50 -53. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2018.01.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同TEXAS大学分级的糖尿病足溃疡患者溃疡愈合时间及住院费用的分析
邹新华1, 李炳辉1, 张静1, 祝友鹏1, 杜烨2, 孙奕2,()   
  1. 1. 430077 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属梨园医院创面修复科
    2. 430077 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-22 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 孙奕
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会面上项目(WJ2017M127); 华中科技大学自主创新研究基金(2015YGYL003)

Analysis of healing time and hospitalization expense in diabetic foot ulcer patients with different TEXAS university grades

Xinhua Zou1, binghui Li1, Jing Zhang1, Youpeng Zhu1, Ye Du2, Yi Sun2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Wound Repair, Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong university of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430077, China
    2. Tongji Medical College of Huazhong university of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430077, China
  • Received:2017-12-22 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yi Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Yi, Email:
引用本文:

邹新华, 李炳辉, 张静, 祝友鹏, 杜烨, 孙奕. 不同TEXAS大学分级的糖尿病足溃疡患者溃疡愈合时间及住院费用的分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(01): 50-53.

Xinhua Zou, binghui Li, Jing Zhang, Youpeng Zhu, Ye Du, Yi Sun. Analysis of healing time and hospitalization expense in diabetic foot ulcer patients with different TEXAS university grades[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2018, 13(01): 50-53.

目的

回顾性分析不同TEXAS大学分级的糖尿病足溃疡患者溃疡愈合时间、住院费用,为糖尿病足溃疡的有效治疗提供依据。

方法

收集华中科技大学同济医学院附属梨园医院2015年5月1日至2016年4月30日期间出院的糖尿病足溃疡患者病例资料,按照病例纳入与排除标准筛选出符合标准的147例,依据TEXAS大学分类法对糖尿病足溃疡患者进行分组,TEXAS大学分级1级组(n=21):表浅溃疡;TEXAS大学分级2级组(n=31):溃疡深达肌腱;TEXAS大学分级3级组(n=95):溃疡累及骨和关节。比较3组糖尿病足溃疡患者溃疡愈合时间、住院费用。对数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。

结果

TEXAS大学分级1、2、3级组糖尿病足溃疡患者愈合时间分别为12、22、33 d,住院费用分别为13 199.20、19 572.81、32 101.30元,不同TEXAS大学分级糖尿病足溃疡患者的愈合时间、住院费用比较差异均有统计学意义(F=24.19、24.04,P值均小于0.05)。

结论

糖尿病足溃疡患者溃疡愈合时间及住院费用与TEXAS大学分级呈正相关。

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the healing time and hospitalization costs of different TEXAS grades and stages patients and provide evidence for effective treatment.

Methods

The data of 147 patients with diabetic foot ulcer discharged in Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016 were collected and screened out according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the classification of TEXAS university, patients with diabetic foot ulcer were grouped, TEXAS university grade 1 group (n=21): superficial ulcer; TEXAS university grade 2 group (n=31): ulcer up to the tendon; TEXAS university grade 3 group (n=95): ulcer involved bone and joint. The ulcer healing time and hospitalization costs of 3 groups of patients with diabetic foot ulcer were compared. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results

Among the 147 patients according to the grades of TEXAS university, the healing time of grade 1, 2 and 3 patients were 12, 22 and 33 days and the hospitalization casts were 13 199.20, 19 572.81, 32 101.30 yuan, and the healing time and hospitalization casts of different TEXAS university grades patients had statistically significant differences (F=24.19, 24.04, with P values below 0.05).

Conclusion

The ulcer healing time and hospitalization costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcer were positively correlated with the grades of TEXAS university.

表1 3组糖尿病足溃疡患者的性别、年龄比较
表2 3组糖尿病足溃疡患者溃疡愈合时间及住院费用比较
[1]
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030[J]. Diabetes Care, 2004, 27(5):1047-1053.
[2]
Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2011, 94(3):311-321.
[3]
Hu H, Sawhney M, Shi L, et al. A systematic review of the direct economic burden of type 2 diabetes in china[J]. Diabetes Ther, 2015, 6(1):7-16.
[4]
Bao X, Yang C, Fang K, et al. Hospitalization costs and complications in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Beijing, China[J]. J Diabetes, 2017, 9(4):405-411.
[5]
王爱红,许樟荣,纪立农. 中国城市医院糖尿病截肢的临床特点及医疗费用分析[J]. 中华医学杂志,2012, 92(4):224-227.
[6]
李炳辉,谷涌泉,王鹏华. 糖尿病足及下肢创面修复[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,2011.
[7]
Oyibo SO, Jude EB, Tarawneh I, et al. A comparison of two diabetic foot ulcer classification systems: the Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems[J]. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24(1):84-88.
[8]
Potier L, Abi Khalil C, Mohammedi K, et al. Use and Utility of ankle brachial index in patients with diabetes[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011, 41(1):110-116.
[9]
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Classification of diabetic foot wounds[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 1996, 35:528-531.
[10]
Australian Government Department of Health: High Risk Foot Model of Care. Website: Health Networks[M]. Western Australia: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010.
[11]
Oyibo SO, Jude EB, Tarawneh I, et al. A Comparison of Two Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification Systems: the Wagner and the University of Texas Wound Classification Systems[J]. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24(1):84-88.
[12]
李佩芝.彩色多普勒超声评价糖尿病足的临床应用[J]. 双足与保健,2017, 26(14):71-72.
[13]
Crawford F, Welch K, Andras A, et al. Ankle brachial index for the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease[J]. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, 2016, 9:CD010680.
[14]
Jiang Y, Huang S, Fu X, et al. Epidemiology of chronic cutaneous wounds in China[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2011, 19(2):181-188.
[15]
Oksuz E, Malhan S, Sonmez B, et al. Cost of illness among patients with diabetic foot ulcer in Turkey[J]. World J Diabetes, 2016, 7(18):462-469.
[16]
李来春,王爱红,胡呈炜,等. 糖尿病足患者住院费用调查及影响因素的研究[J].中国糖尿病杂志. 2017, 25(4):339-343.
[17]
王玉珍,许樟荣,胡成玮. 糖尿病足患者的临床特点及住院费用分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2003, 2(4):271-274.
[18]
徐莉. 糖尿病足住院患者药费的影响因素分析[J]. 广州医药,2014, 45:62-65.
[19]
岑石强,黄富强,赵纪春,等. 糖尿病足的外科治疗策略[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2008, 22(7):803-806.
[20]
刘建琴,许樟荣. 糖尿病足的预防与患者的自我管理[J]. 中国医刊,2017, 52(2):14-17.
[21]
许樟荣,王玉珍. 糖尿病足的综合防治和分级管理[J]. 中国医刊,2017,52(2):11-14.
[22]
Driver VR, Fabbi M, Lavery LA, et al. The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 52(3 Suppl):17S-22S.
[1] 赵雪, 金萌, 赖建铭, 戎赞华, 白欣立. 儿童白塞病合并肠道假性息肉2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 460-467.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 周涵, 武胡雯, 张培深, 邓晗彬, 范闻轩, 李嘉诚, 程少文. 蛋白质组学在慢性难愈合创面研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 536-540.
[4] 别瑶, 曹志斌, 辛静, 王健楠, 惠宗光. 应用基质血管成分细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 453-456.
[5] 姜珊, 李湘燕, 田硕涵, 温冰, 何睿, 齐心. 采用优化抗感染治疗模式改善糖尿病足感染预后的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 398-403.
[6] 谢芬, 陈洁, 张媛媛, 刘茜, 胡芬, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 金环. 移动健康管理模式在糖尿病足管理中的应用效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 335-340.
[7] 兰华, 高丽莎, 申明, 张铭光. 内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡出血的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 467-469.
[8] 赖圣杰, 方欣, 方友强. 2023年欧洲内分泌学会及加拿大泌尿外科学会肾上腺偶发瘤诊疗指南解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 309-312.
[9] 董晓斌, 张静, 苏莎莎, 莎比亚·沙吾提, 盛好. 溃疡性结肠炎患者相关环状RNA 差异表达谱分析及功能研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 499-509.
[10] 丁亚琴, 方旭, 戴彦成. 基于紧密型医联体的“一免三优先政策”在基层消化道肿瘤筛查中的应用探讨[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 481-484.
[11] 陈利, 杨长青, 朱风尚. 重视炎症性肠病和代谢相关脂肪性肝病间的串话机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 385-389.
[12] 孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[13] 陈明敏, 任菁菁. 全科医师叙事能力探讨与思考[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 836-840.
[14] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
[15] 黄镪, 孙金梅, 韩燕飞, 张拥波. 脑源性与非脑源性疾病所致应激性溃疡相关胃肠道出血的影响因素及临床预后差异:一项回顾性队列研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 309-316.
阅读次数
全文


摘要