切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 465 -469. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2020.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

微动力负压技术治疗小面积Ⅲ度低热烧伤创面的临床疗效观察
潘博涵1, 相阳2, 汤焘1, 朱世辉1, 孙瑜1,()   
  1. 1. 200433 上海,海军军医大学第一附属医院烧伤外科
    2. 116085 大连,解放军海军92694部队医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-23 出版日期:2020-12-01
  • 通信作者: 孙瑜
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81772125)

Clinical effect of micro-dynamic negative pressure wound therapy on small area full thickness burn wounds caused by low-heat

Bohan Pan1, Yang Xiang2, Tao Tang1, Shihui Zhu1, Yu Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burn Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
    2. 92694 Hospital of PLA Navy, Dalian 116085, China
  • Received:2020-10-23 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yu Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Yu, Email:
引用本文:

潘博涵, 相阳, 汤焘, 朱世辉, 孙瑜. 微动力负压技术治疗小面积Ⅲ度低热烧伤创面的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(06): 465-469.

Bohan Pan, Yang Xiang, Tao Tang, Shihui Zhu, Yu Sun. Clinical effect of micro-dynamic negative pressure wound therapy on small area full thickness burn wounds caused by low-heat[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2020, 15(06): 465-469.

目的

观察微动力负压技术(micro-dynamic negative pressure wound therapy, MDNPWT)应用于小面积Ⅲ度低热烧伤创面的临床疗效。

方法

收集2016年1月至2018年5月于海军军医大学第一附属医院烧伤外科门诊就诊的小面积(≤10 cm2)Ⅲ度低热烧伤患者220例。应用MDNPWT治疗的108例患者设为微动力负压组,采用常规治疗的112例患者设为常规治疗组。微动力负压组患者入组后采取持续微动力负压护创敷料换药,而常规治疗组采用传统的外用药物治疗。对比微动力负压组和常规治疗组的创面愈合时间、换药次数、治疗总费用及手术率。对数据行t检验和χ2检验。

结果

微动力负压组和常规治疗组的创面愈合时间分别为(31.8±3.5)、(48.0±13.9) d,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t=11.75,P<0.05);微动力负压组和常规治疗组的换药次数分别为(6.4±0.7)、(34.2±3.1)次,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t=18.76,P<0.05);微动力负压组和常规治疗组治疗总费用分别为(2 807.5±782.6)、(7 516.7±238.3)元,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t=18.55,P<0.05);微动力负压组和常规治疗组的手术率分别为0、70.5%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=118.9,P<0.05)。

结论

MDNPWT具有缩短创面愈合时间、减少换药次数、节省治疗总费用及降低小面积深度烧伤创面手术率等优点。因此,MDNPWT可以作为小面积Ⅲ度低热烧伤创面治疗安全有效的新方法。

Objective

To summarize the clinical effect of micro-dynamic negative pressure wound therapy(MDNPWT) on small area full thickness burn wounds caused by low-heat.

Methods

Clinical data of 220 outpatients with small area full thickness burn wounds caused by low-heat from Jan, 2016 to May, 2018 in Department of Burns Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University were collected. One hundred and eight patients treated with MDNPWT were set as micro-dynamic negative pressure group. One hundred and twelve patients treated with conventional treatment were set as conventional treatment group. MDNPWT wound dressing were used for dressing change in micro-dynamic negative pressure group, while classic wound dressing were used for dressing change in conventional treatment group. Healing time, frequency of dressing change, total costs, surgery rates of the 2 groups were compared. Data were processed with t test and chi-square test.

Results

The healing time in the micro-dynamic negative pressure group and conventional treatment group were (31.8±3.5), (48.0±13.9) d, the difference was statistically significant (t=11.75, P<0.05). The average times in the micro-dynamic negative pressure group and conventional treatment group were (6.4±0.7), (34.2±3.1) times, the difference was statistically significant (t=18.76, P<0.05). Total costs in the micro-dynamic negative pressure group and conventional treatment group were (2 807.5±782.6), (7516.7±238.3) yuan, the difference was statistically significant(t=18.55, P<0.05). Surgery rates in the micro-dynamic negative pressure group and conventional treatment group were 0 and 70.5%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=118.9, P<0.05).

Conclusion

MDNPWT can be used as a new method to treat full thickness burn wounds caused by low-heat as it shows advantages in shortening wound healing time, saving treatment costs, lowing dressing change frequency and surgery rate.

表1 微动力负压治疗组与常规治疗组小面积Ⅲ度低热烧伤患者一般资料
表2 微动力负压治疗组与常规治疗组小面积Ⅲ度低热烧伤治疗结果相关指标
[1]
贾赤宇,余东文,龙艺. 低温烫伤的特点与治疗[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2011, 6(5): 71-72.
[2]
雷万军,景爱华. 我国低热烧伤治疗现状[J]. 河南科技大学学报,2015, 33(3): 231-234.
[3]
时婕,余又新,徐庆连. 低温烫伤两种治疗方法临床分析[J]. 安徽医学,2009, 30(12): 1412-1415.
[4]
马承华,胡昕,程广斌,等. 微动力负压技术的真空压差形成过程及应用研究[J]. 医疗卫生装备,2017, 38(3): 25-27.
[5]
Seidel D, Storck M, Lawall H, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard moist wound care on diabetic foot ulcers in real-life clinical practice: results of the German DiaFu-RCT[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(3): 1-16.
[6]
Biermann N, Geissler EK, Brix E, et al. Pressure distribution and flow characteristics during negative pressure wound therapy[J]. J Tissue Viability, 2020, 29(1): 32-36.
[7]
Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, 238(239): 263-285.
[8]
周波,陈旭林,程浩,等. 微动力负压护创敷料对兔II度烧伤创面愈合的影响[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2015, 10(2): 103-106.
[9]
苏海涛,吕茁,李宜姝,等. 微动力负压引流技术在烧伤及难愈创面作用的临床研究[J]. 黑龙江医学,2019, 43(1): 14-16.
[10]
王俊青. 应用负压治疗技术修复小儿浅II度烫伤创面的效果观察[J/CD]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018, 3(17): 130.
[11]
Ozkan B, Ertas NM, Bali U, et al. Clinical Experiences with Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Treatment on Various Anatomic Locations[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(6): 1-11.
[12]
Thompson JT, Marks MW. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy[J]. Deutsches Aerzteblatt International, 2017, 34(4): 673-684.
[13]
Chu H, Maklad M, Cobley T, et al. The use of negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT), as an adjunct for primary wound healing, in deep partial-thickness paediatric foot burns: A case report[J]. Burns Open, 2020, 4(3): 60-63.
[14]
Nolff MC, Fehr M, Bolling A, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy, silver coated foam dressing and conventional bandages in open wound treatment in dogs[J]. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2015, 28(1): 30-38.
[15]
Ingo L, Fried FW, Katharina K, et al. Negative pressure wound treatment with computer-controlled irrigation/instillation decreases bacterial load in contaminated wounds and facilitates wound closure[J]. Int Wound J, 2018, 15(6): 978-984.
[16]
Kim PJ, Lavery LA, Galiano RD, et al. The impact of negative, ressure wound therapy with instillation on wounds requiring operative debridement: Pilot randomised, controlled trial[J]. Int Wound J, 2020, 17(5): 1194-1208.
[17]
Lesiak AC, Shafritz AB. Negative-pressure wound therapy[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2013, 38(9): 1828-1832.
[1] 王宏宇, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 陈强, 闫增强. 亲属头皮加自体头皮混合移植接力在大面积深度烧伤创面修复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 554-554.
[2] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[3] 彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.
[4] 林同辉, 杨卫玺. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣在电烧伤治疗中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 526-530.
[5] 张嘉炜, 王瑞, 张克诚, 易磊, 周增丁. 烧烫伤创面深度智能检测模型P-YOLO的建立及测试效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 379-385.
[6] 毛书雷, 张元海, 王杰, 倪良方, 王新刚, 邹雁, 王荣娟, 吴军梅, 张建芬. 区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤的临床疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 386-392.
[7] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[8] 杨新园, 王淑君, 何成, 宋喜鹤, 刘丽芸. 预防与处理危重烧伤患者经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管堵塞的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 443-446.
[9] 孙勇, 彭曦. 重视烧伤创面愈合中的葡萄糖代谢以优化营养治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 277-281.
[10] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[11] 温春泉, 陈欣, 尹凯, 赵筱卓, 张琮, 程琳, 陈辉. 旋肩胛动脉穿支皮瓣在烧伤后重度腋窝瘢痕挛缩畸形整形修复治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 294-298.
[12] 陈宏泽, 刘晟, 陈旭林. 水动力清创系统在大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面清创中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 314-318.
[13] 张庆庆, 曲毅睿, 王淑君, 孙凤, 侯晓敏, 耿丽, 孙天骏. 北京市某三甲医院急诊成人烧烫伤的流行病学特征[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 324-328.
[14] 临床多学科协作专家组. 腹盆部创伤急诊CT 专家推荐指南(2024)[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 222-229.
[15] 田峰瑞, 蒋锦源, 李阳, 张连阳. Morel-Lavallée 损伤继发血清肿一例[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 245-248.
阅读次数
全文


摘要