切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 283 -291. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.04.002

论著·糖尿病与糖尿病足的防治

湖北省某创面修复中心慢性难愈合创面住院患者的流行病学调查分析
蔡红升1, 李炳辉1, 沈谦2, 杨文波1, 陈妍雯1, 李恭驰3,()   
  1. 1. 430077 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属梨园医院创面修复中心,湖北省慢性创面及糖尿病足医学临床研究中心
    2. 430073 武汉,中南财经政法大学外国语学院
    3. 430022 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院手外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-11 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 李恭驰
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省慢性创面及糖尿病医学临床研究中心资助项目(2018BCC340); 湖北省自然科学基金面上项目(2018CFB756); 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81801922); 国家重大疾病多学科合作诊疗能力建设项目(国卫办医函[2019]542号)

Epidemiological investigation and analysis of inpatients with chronic refractory wounds in a wound repair center in Hubei province

Hongsheng Cai1, Binghui Li1, Qian Shen2, Wenbo Yang1, Yanwen Chen1, Gongchi Li3,()   

  1. 1. Wound Repair Center of Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Chronic Wound and Diabetic Foot Medicine, Wuhan 430077, China
    2. School of Foreign Languages, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
    3. Department of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
  • Received:2022-06-11 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Gongchi Li
引用本文:

蔡红升, 李炳辉, 沈谦, 杨文波, 陈妍雯, 李恭驰. 湖北省某创面修复中心慢性难愈合创面住院患者的流行病学调查分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 283-291.

Hongsheng Cai, Binghui Li, Qian Shen, Wenbo Yang, Yanwen Chen, Gongchi Li. Epidemiological investigation and analysis of inpatients with chronic refractory wounds in a wound repair center in Hubei province[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(04): 283-291.

目的

通过对湖北省某创面修复中心慢性难愈合创面住院患者的病例资料进行回顾,分析其流行病学特点,以期为该病防治对策的制订提供参考。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月华中科技大学同济医学院附属梨园医院创面修复中心收治的慢性难愈合创面住院患者的病例资料。收集信息包括患者的性别、居住地区、职业、基础疾病、吸烟史、创面类型、年龄、住院时间、住院费用、治疗方式(手术治疗、保守治疗)、临床转归、各项医疗费用情况及创面检出病原菌情况。数据比较采用χ2检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验。

结果

(1)本研究共纳入慢性难愈合创面住院患者2 402例,其中男1 593例(66.3%),女809例(33.7 %);城市人口1 459例(60.7%),农村人口943例(39.3%);患者离退休及从事体力劳动所占比例较大,分别为52.1%、28.8%;74.4%的患者合并有糖尿病,其次是高血压(57.5%)和心脏病(31.8%);52.7%的患者有吸烟史。(2)不同创面类型中,糖尿病创面最为多见,占62.3%(1 497/2 402);其次是压力性创面,占13.9%(334/2 402);动脉性创面占6.2%(148/2 402);静脉性创面占5.0%(121/2 402),其他原因所致创面占12.6%(302/2 402)。(3)不同创面类型的慢性难愈合创面患者的性别和年龄段分布比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=30.564、28.536,P<0.05);其中患病比例最高的年龄段为61~80岁(54.7%),其次为41~60岁(29.4%)和80岁以上(11.8%);41~60岁和61~80岁为糖尿病创面和静脉性创面高发年龄段,61~80岁和80岁以上为压力性创面和动脉性创面高发年龄段。(4)2 402例慢性难愈合创面住院患者中,压力性创面患者的平均住院时间最长,为31(19, 35) d,动脉性创面和静脉性创面患者的平均住院时间最短,分别为19(9, 25)d和19(11, 26)d;动脉性创面患者的平均住院费用最高,为91 361.5(17 033.5, 143 090.4)元,其次为糖尿病创面患者,为45 008.4(10 574.0, 57 020.7)元;不同类型慢性难愈合创面住院患者的住院时间及住院费用比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=25.346、32.460,P<0.05)。(5)手术治疗的患者中,压力性创面患者的住院时间最长,为39(26, 42) d、动脉性创面患者的住院费用最高,为118 341.1(77 151.3, 162 281.1)元;保守治疗的患者中,其他创面患者的住院时间最长、动脉性创面患者的住院费用最高;不同治疗方式患者的住院费用及住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=110.260、120.765,P<0.05)。(6)2 402例患者中,痊愈占22.0%(529/2 402),显效占76.3%(1 833/2 402),未愈占1.7%(40/2 402),未愈患者中死亡12例,占患者总人数的0.5%;痊愈、显效、未愈患者的住院时间分别为31(15, 39)、25(12, 30)、19(5, 24) d,住院费用分别为45 360.6(11 664.3, 56 208.8)、42 824.2(10 107.1, 52 415.1)、37 017.4(8 031.3, 31 942.9)元,痊愈患者的住院时间比显效及未愈患者长,其住院费用比显效及未愈患者多,不同临床转归患者住院时间和住院费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=3.031、6.780,P>0.05)。(7)2 402例慢性难愈合创面住院患者的总医疗费用为103 973 107元,各项医疗费用中耗材费和药品费占比较高,分别为42.1%和23.4%,护理费和输血费用占比较低,分别为1.2%和0.2%。(8)2 402例患者中有926例(38.6%)进行了创面病原菌检查,其中681例创面病原菌检测结果为阳性,检测阳性率为73.5%(681/926)。其中革兰阴性菌占50.8%(346/681),主要以铜绿假单胞菌(13.5%)、大肠杆菌(11.6%)、鲍曼不动杆菌(6.2%)为主;革兰阳性菌占42.4%(289/681),主要以金黄色葡萄球菌(17.8%)、表皮葡萄球菌(7.2%)、肠球菌属(9.2%)为主;真菌占6.8%(46/681),主要为白色念珠菌(2.5%)。

结论

慢性难愈合创面住院患者以中老年人为主,男性多于女性。糖尿病创面、压力性创面及血管性创面是该病主要原因。压力性创面的患者平均住院时间最长,动脉性创面患者的平均住院费用最高。治疗方式以手术为主,本中心采用多学科诊疗模式进行创面治疗,愈合率较高。创面病原菌中以革兰阴性菌最为多见,以铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、鲍曼不动杆菌为主。倡导健全大型综合医院创面治疗中心和社区卫生服务中心双向转诊机制,成立创面修复护理中心,同时加强对该病知识宣教,提高防治意识。

Objective

Analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of inpatients with chronic refractory wounds in a wound repair center in Hubei province by reviewing the data of them, in order to provide reference for the formulation of prevention and treatment strategies for the disease.

Methods

The case data of inpatients with chronic refractory wounds admitted to the Wound Repair Center of Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The collected information includes the patient's gender, living area, occupation, underlying disease, smoking history, wound type, age, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, treatment method (surgical treatment, conservative treatment), clinical outcome, various medical expenses and wound surface detection of pathogenic bacteria. Data were compared by chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Results

(1) A total of 2 402 inpatients with chronic refractory wounds were included in this study, including 1 593 males (66.3%) and 809 females (33.7%); there were 1 459 (60.7%) of the urban population and 943 cases (39.3%) of the rural population; the proportion of patients engaged in retirement and manual labor was relatively large, 52.1% and 28.8%, respectively; 74.4% of the patients had diabetes, followed by hypertension (57.5%) and heart disease (31.8%); 52.7% of patients had a history of smoking. (2) Among different wound types, diabetic wounds were the most common, accounting for 62.3% (1 497/2 402); followed by pressure wounds, accounting for 13.9% (334/2 402); arterial wounds accounted for 6.2% (148/2 402); venous wounds accounted for 5.0% (121/2 402), and wounds caused by other reasons accounted for 12.6% (302/2 402). (3) The gender and age distribution of chronic refractory wound patients with different types of wounds were compared, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=30.564, 28.536; P<0.05); the age group with the highest prevalence rate was 61-80 years old (54.7%), followed by 41-60 years old (29.4%) and over 80 years old (11.8%); 41-60 years old and 61-80 years old with high incidence of diabetic wounds and venous wounds, and 61-80 years old and over 80 years old were the high incidence of pressure wounds and arterial wounds. (4) Among the 2 402 inpatients with chronic refractory wounds, the patients with pressure wounds had the longestaverage hospital stay, which was 31 (19, 35) d, and the patients with arterial wounds and venous wounds had the shortest average hospitalization time, which were 19 (9, 25) d and 19 (11, 26) d, respectively. The average hospitalization cost of patients with arterial wounds was the highest, which was 91 361.5 (17 033.5, 143 090.4) yuan, followed by patients with diabetic wounds, which was 45 008.4 (10 574.0, 57 020.7) yuan. There were statistically significant differences in hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses among patients with different types of chronic refractory wounds (χ2=25.346, 32.460; P<0.05). (5) Among the patients treated by surgery, patients with pressure wounds had the longest hospitalization time 39 (26, 42) d, and patients with arterial wounds had the highest hospitalization costs, which was 118 341.1 (77 151.3, 162 281.1) yuan; among the patients with conservative treatment, other wound patients had the longest hospitalization time, and patients with arterial wounds had the highest hospitalization costs; the hospitalization costs and hospitalization time of patients with different treatment methods were statistically significantly differents (χ2=110.260, 120.765; P<0.05). (6) Among the 2 402 patients, 22.0% (529/2 402) were cured, 76.3% (1 833/2 402) were markedly effective, 1.7% (40/2 402) were not cured, and 12 of them died, accounting for 0.5% of the total number of patients. The hospitalization time of the cured, markedly effective and unhealed patients were 31 (15, 39), 25 (12, 30), and 19 (5, 24) d, respectively, and the hospitalization expenses were 45 360.6 (11 664.3, 56 208.8), 42 824.2 (10 107.1, 52 415.1), 37 017.4 (8 031.3, 31 942.9) yuan, respectively. The hospitalization time of cured patients was longer than that of markedly effective and unhealed patients, and the hospitalization cost was higher than that of markedly effective and unrecovered patients. There were no statistically significant differences in hospitalization time and hospitalization cost among patients with different clinical outcomes (χ2=3.031, 6.780; P>0.05). (7) The total medical expenses of the 2 402 inpatients with chronic refractory wounds were 103 973 107 yuan. Consumables and medicines accounted for a relatively high proportion of various medical expenses, accounting for 42.1% and 23.4%, respectively. Nursing expenses and blood transfusion expenses accounted for a relatively low proportion, at 1.2% and 0.2%, respectively. (8) Among the 2 402 patients, 926 (38.6%) were examined for pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface, of which 681 were positive for pathogenic wounds, with a positive rate of 73.5% (681/926). Among them, Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 50.8% (346/681), mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.5%), Escherichia coli (11.6%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (6.2%); Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 42.4% (289/681), mainly Staphylococcus aureus (17.8%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.2%), and Enterococcus (9.2%); fungi accounted for 6.8% (46/681), mainly Candida albicans (2.5%).

Conclusions

The inpatients with chronic refractory wounds are mainly middle-aged and elderly people, and there are more males than females. Diabetic wounds, pressure wounds and vascular wounds are the main causes of the disease. Patients with pressure wounds had the longest average hospital stay, and patients with arterial wounds had the highest average hospitalization costs. The main treatment method is surgery. The unit adopts a multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment mode for wound treatment, and the healing rate is high. Gram-negative bacteria are the most common pathogens on the wound surface, mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter baumannii. It is necessary to advocate and improve the two-way referral mechanism between wound treatment centers in large general hospitals and community health service centers, and establish wound repair and nursing centers, strengthen publicity and education about the disease, and improve awareness of prevention and treatment.

表1 2 402例慢性难愈合创面住院患者基本情况
表2 2 402例不同类型慢性难愈合创面住院患者性别和年龄段分布[例(%)]
表3 2 402例不同类型慢性难愈合创面住院患者的住院时间及住院费用情况[M(Q1, Q3)]
表4 2 402例不同类型慢性难愈合创面住院患者不同治疗方式的住院时间和住院费用情况[M(Q1, Q3)]
表5 不同临床转归的慢性难愈合创面住院患者住院时间和住院费用情况[M(Q1, Q3)]
表6 2 402例慢性难愈合创面住院患者各项医疗费用情况
表7 681例慢性难愈合创面住院患者创面检出病原菌情况
[1]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于加强体表慢性难愈合创面(溃疡)诊疗管理工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2019-11-29)[2022-05-10].

URL    
[2]
廖新成,郭光华. 慢性难愈性创面的分类鉴别及临床评估[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(4): 303-305.
[3]
Raeder K, Strube-Lahmann S, Müller-Werdan U, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of chronic wounds among clients of home care services in Germany[J]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2019, 140: 14-21.
[4]
Fife CE, Carter MJ. Wound care outcomes and associated cost among patients treated in US outpatient wound centers :data from the US wound registry[J]. Wounds, 2012, 24 (1): 10-17.
[5]
Awasthi A, Singh SK, Kumar B, et al. Treatment strategies against diabetic foot ulcer: success so far and the road ahead[J]. Curr Diabetes Rev, 2021, 17(4): 421-436.
[6]
苑海刚,薛凤,赵钢. 蓬子菜水溶液对糖尿病患者皮肤溃疡的临床疗效观察[J]. 中医药信息2016, 33(2): 87-89.
[7]
Meddings J, Reichert H, Rogers MA, et al. Under pressure: financial effect of the hospital-acquired conditions initiative-a statewide analysis of pressure ulcer development and payment[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2015, 63(7): 1407-1412.
[8]
Cheng B, Jiang Y, Fu X, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and clinical analyses of chronic cutaneous wounds of inpatients in China: prevention and control[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2020, 28(5): 623-630.
[9]
Finlayson K, Edwards H, Courtney M. The impact of psychosocial factors on adherence to compression therapy to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2010, 19(9/10): 1289-1297.
[10]
Fu X, Sheng Z, Cherry GW, et al. Epidemiological study of chronic dermal ulcers in China[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 1998, 6(1): 21-27.
[11]
Jiang Y, Huang S, Fu X, et al. Epidemiology of chronic cutaneous wounds in China[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2011, 19(2): 181-188.
[12]
付小兵. 中国特色创面修复学科体系建设的内涵[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(1): 1-4.
[13]
付小兵. 战时治烧伤,平时治创面:有关烧伤学科发展的一点思考[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2018, 34(7): 434-436.
[14]
付小兵. 以创建研究型医院的总体思路指导创面治疗学科建设与创面治疗专科人才的培养[J]. 中国研究型医院2016, 3(1): 2-5.
[15]
姜玉峰. 中国体表慢性难愈合创面流行病学研究[D]. 北京:解放军军医进修学院,2011.
[16]
Makrantonaki E, Wlaschek M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Pathogenesis of wound healing disorders in the elderly[J]. J Ger Soc Dermatol JDDG, 2017, 15(3): 255-275.
[17]
Haughey L, Barbul A. Nutrition and lower extremity ulcers: causality and/or treatment[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2017, 16(4): 238-243.
[18]
Kørbling M, Estrov Z. Adult stem cells for tissue repair -a new therapeutic concept?[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349(6): 570-582.
[19]
郭海水,路远,吕海东,等. 慢性难愈性创面综合治疗方法探讨[J]. 山西医药杂志2014, 43(9): 1052-1054.
[20]
黄志福. 近六年慢性难愈创面临床流行病学调查[D]. 南宁:广西医科大学,2019.
[21]
蒋国群. 近5年慢性难愈创面住院患者临床特点调查分析[D]. 衡阳:南华大学,2014.
[22]
付小兵. 构建一个创面治疗学科体系:中国特色创面治疗中心建设20年的回顾与展望[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2018, 34(12): 859-863.
[23]
周秋红,许景灿,许樟荣,等. 国际糖尿病足工作组:糖尿病足防治实践指南—《国际糖尿病足工作组:糖尿病足防治国际指南(2019)》的一部分[J]. 感染、炎症、修复2019, 20(3): 131-139.
[24]
International Working Group on Diabetic Foot. A systematic review of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers ofthe foot in diabetes[M]. Netherlands: Noordwijkerhout, 2011.
[25]
Snyder RJ, Kirsner RS, Warriner RA 3rd, et al.Consensus recommendations on advancing the standard of care for treating neuropathicfoot ulcers in patients with diabetes[J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2010, 56(4 Suppl): S1-24.
[26]
姜玉峰,许樟荣,付小兵. 整体观、系统观、多学科合作在糖尿病足诊治中的重要性[J]. 感染、炎症、修复2012, 13(2): 67-69.
[27]
Piaggesi A, Schipani E, Campi F, et al. Conservative surgical approach versus non-surgical management for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: a randomized trial[J]. Diabetic Med, 1998, 15(5): 412-417.
[28]
於琴,陈凤芹. 下肢慢性溃疡病因治疗及伤口护理效果分析[J]. 安徽医学2018, 39(6): 752-754.
[29]
王丹,李善玲,余茴香. 慢性创面患者生活质量研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志2017, 32(10): 103-106.
[30]
何业萍. 延续护理在慢性伤口患者出院后护理中的效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志2019, 38(6): 862-864.
[31]
章万幸,蒋亚楠,葛华强,等. 慢性感染性难愈合创面病原菌分布与药物敏感性及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志2021, 33(3): 178-184.
[32]
Kalan LR, Brennan MB. The role of the microbiome in nonhealing diabetic wounds[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2019, 1435(1): 79-92.
[1] 韩珊珊, 徐琰, 陈卿, 杨钰坪, 明佳, 周妮娅, 李雪, 刘科. 近日节律紊乱与乳腺癌的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 102-106.
[2] 刘丽, 贾小慧, 刘艳, 沈晓佳, 周谦, 张海洋, 向丽佳, 温晓滨, 周元琳, 许婉婷, 杨磊, 李磊, 王林, 唐义蓉. 2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.
[3] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
[4] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[5] 廖锵云, 王震, 林洁玉, 廖夏, 邓锦华, 李杰峰, 邓建维, 李明, 荣新洲. 虎门地区创伤弧菌感染的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 394-398.
[6] 陈继秋, 朱世辉. 皮肤牵张装置的临床应用现状[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 451-453.
[7] 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会, 中国生物材料学会烧创伤创面修复材料分会. 中国糖尿病足截肢(趾)治疗专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 1-9.
[8] 张海森, 叶金宝, 高鹏飞. 胆囊息肉流行病学调查及其进展影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 91-95.
[9] 李俸鑫, 许建文, 陈如玉, 李常秋, 王继羚, 谭秀伟, 卜海峰, 王海霖, 苏义基. 2015至2020年广西医科大学第一附属医院老年脊髓损伤的特征分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 45-50.
[10] 王伊帆, 陈燕, 彭劲民, 杜斌, 翁利. 中国脓毒症流行病学的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 89-94.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 肖贵宝, 尼玛卓玛, 王峰, 王晋龙. 高原地区单中心五年肾癌临床病理特点分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 647-651.
[13] 王华, 张含花, 刘欢宇, 邵佩, 任晓侠, 侯崇智, 南丹, 闫楠, 方莹. 误吞磁性消化道异物住院患儿153例临床特点分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 248-252.
[14] 韩珂, 王祥耀, 茹楠, 牛晓彤, 向京元, 王妍, 高飞, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 肥胖成人慢性腹泻患病率的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 115-120.
[15] 陈升鑫, 翟亚奇, 卜保国, 陈德鑫, 吴浪, 方开萱, 刘文静, 李明阳, 令狐恩强. 自身免疫性胰腺炎临床特征分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 46-51.
阅读次数
全文


摘要