切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 399 -404. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.05.004

论著

脱细胞异体真皮与自体刃厚皮片联合移植修复足踝部非负重区创面的临床研究
任尊1, 蔡伟杰1, 张瑜博1, 卢玉祥1, 程鹏飞1, 徐铮宇1, 韩培1,()   
  1. 1. 200233 上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-07 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 韩培
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81974325); 上海市科学技术委员会科技计划项目(22ZR1447500)

Clinical research of co-transplantation of acellular allogeneic dermis and autologous razor-thin skin for repairing wound in non-weight-bearing area of foot and ankle

Zun Ren1, Weijie Cai1, Yubo Zhang1, Yuxiang Lu1, Pengfei Cheng1, Zhengyu Xu1, Pei Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
  • Received:2022-07-07 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Pei Han
引用本文:

任尊, 蔡伟杰, 张瑜博, 卢玉祥, 程鹏飞, 徐铮宇, 韩培. 脱细胞异体真皮与自体刃厚皮片联合移植修复足踝部非负重区创面的临床研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 399-404.

Zun Ren, Weijie Cai, Yubo Zhang, Yuxiang Lu, Pengfei Cheng, Zhengyu Xu, Pei Han. Clinical research of co-transplantation of acellular allogeneic dermis and autologous razor-thin skin for repairing wound in non-weight-bearing area of foot and ankle[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(05): 399-404.

目的

探讨脱细胞异体真皮与自体刃厚皮片联合移植在足踝部非负重区创面修复中的疗效。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究方法,分析2015年1月至2021年3月上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院收治的51例足踝部非负重区创面患者。按照治疗方式不同进行分组,行复合皮移植治疗患者24例,设为复合皮移植组;采用自体全厚皮片移植治疗患者27例设为全厚皮移植组。患者创面清创后,复合皮移植组用脱细胞异体真皮覆盖创面,其上覆盖自体刃厚皮片联合移植,全厚皮移植组使用自体全厚皮片覆盖创面。术后评估2组患者的皮片成活率、再植皮率、创面愈合时间以及供皮区愈合时间。术后随访12个月,末次随访时进行美国足踝外科医师协会(AOFAS)踝关节功能评估及温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分。数据比较采用t检验、Wilcoxon检验、卡方检验及Fisher精确检验。

结果

术后评估,复合皮移植组和全厚皮移植组的皮片最终均存活。全厚皮移植组因术后皮片部分坏死的再植皮率为22.2%(6/27),高于复合皮移植组的4.2%(1/24),但差异无统计学意义(P= 0.103)。复合皮移植组创面愈合时间为17.0(15.8, 18.0)d,显著短于全厚皮移植组的24.0(18.0, 38.0)d,差异有统计学意义(Z= -4.222, P< 0.01)。2组患者供区愈合时间差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。复合皮移植组的AOFAS踝关节功能评分为93.0(92.0, 95.0)分,显著优于全厚皮移植组的87.0(84.0, 91.5)分,差异有统计学意义(Z= 3.574, P< 0.01)。复合皮移植组VSS评分为5.0(4.0, 6.0)分,优于全厚皮移植组7.0(5.5, 8.5)分,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.823, P< 0.01)。

结论

脱细胞异体真皮与自体刃厚皮片联合移植可有效修复足踝部非负重区皮肤软组织缺损,显著促进创面愈合,术后瘢痕较轻且可保持良好的踝关节功能。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of co-transplantation of the acellular allogeneic dermis and autologous razor-thin skin for repairing wounds in the non-weight-bearing area of the foot and ankle.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed. From January 2015 to March 2021, 51 patients with skin and soft tissue defects in the non-weight-bearing area of the foot and ankle were admitted to the Shanghai Sixth People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Patients were grouped according to different treatment methods. 24 patients who received composite skin transplantation were designated as the co-transplantation group, and 27 patients who received autologous full-thickness skin grafting were designated as the full-thickness skin transplantation group. After debridement of the wound, the co-transplantation group was covered with the acellular allogeneic dermis, which was covered with autologous razor-thin skin grafts for combined transplantation, and the full-thickness skin graft group was covered with autologous full-thickness skin grafts. The survival rate of grafts, wound healing time, donor site healing time, and wound regrafting rate were evaluated postoperatively in both groups. The postoperative follow-up was 12 months, and AOFAS ankle function evaluation and vancouver scar scale (VSS) were performed at the last follow-up. Data were compared using the t-test, Wilcoxon test, chi-square test and Fisher′s exact test.

Results

The postoperative evaluation showed that all the transplantations in the two groups survived. The regrafting rate due to partial necrosis of the skin graft in the full-thickness skin transplantation group (22.2%, 6/27) was higher than that in the co-transplantation group (4.2%, 1/24) but no statistically significant difference (P= 0.103). The wound healing time in the co-transplantation group was 17.0 (15.8, 18.0) d, which was significantly shorter than that in the full-thickness skin transplantation group, which was 24.0 (18.0, 38.0) d, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-4.222, P< 0.01). There was no significant difference in the healing time of the donor site between the two groups (P> 0.05). The AOFAS ankle function score of the co-transplantation group was 93.0 (92.0, 95.0) points, which was significantly better than that of the full-thickness skin graft group, which was 87.0 (84.0, 91.5) points (Z= 3.574, P< 0.01). The VSS score of the co-transplantation group was 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) points, which was better than that of the full-thickness skin transplantation group, which was 7.0 (5.5, 8.5) points, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.823, P< 0.01).

Conclusions

The co-transplantation of the acellular allogeneic dermis and autologous razor-thin skin graft can effectively repair the wound in the non-weight-bearing area of the foot and ankle, significantly reduce the postoperative scarring, preserve good ankle function after surgery, and promote wound healing.

图1 足踝皮肤软组织缺损分区四面观[2]注:足踝皮肤软组织缺损7个分区,1区为足趾部,2区为足底部前1/3,3区为足背及足底外侧部,4区为足背及足底内侧部,5区为足跟部,6区为外踝,7区为内踝。A示足底面;B示足踝外侧面;C示足踝内侧面;D示足踝背面
表1 2组足踝部非负重区皮肤软组织缺损患者一般资料比较
表2 2组足踝部非负重区皮肤软组织缺损患者创面分区、感染率及面积比较
表3 2组足踝部非负重区皮肤软组织缺损患者再植皮率、创面及供皮区愈合时间、AOFAS及VSS评分比较
图2 右侧足踝区皮肤软组织缺损患者行复合皮移植。A示患者足踝区大面积皮肤软组织缺损伴感染;B示一期彻底清创;C、D示二期异体真皮与自体刃厚皮片联合移植,白色虚线框内为复合皮植皮区域,其余创面由中厚皮片移植修复;E,F示患者术后12个月复查踝关节背伸、跖屈活动良好;G,H示患者创面愈合,皮肤活动度良好,外踝复合皮移植区域瘢痕轻,无瘢痕挛缩
[1]
Volgas DA, Harder Y. Manual of Soft-Tissue Management in Orthopaedic Trauma [A]. 2011.
[2]
Hollenbeck ST, Woo S, Komatsu I, et al. Longitudinal outcomes and application of the subunit principle to 165 foot and ankle free tissue transfers [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2010, 125(3): 924-934.
[3]
Sarkozyova N, Dragunova J, Bukovcan P, et al. Preparation and processing of human allogenic dermal matrix for utilization in reconstructive surgical procedures [J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2020, 121(6): 386-394.
[4]
郭海雷,凌翔伟,刘政军,等. 刃厚头皮与异体脱细胞真皮基质复合移植修复特大面积烧伤患者手部深度创面[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2019, 35(12): 876-878.
[5]
高磊,秦新愿,李天博,等. 脱细胞同种异体真皮与自体刃厚皮联合移植修复糖尿病足创面[J]. 中国组织工程研究2022, 26(14): 2138-2143.
[6]
Zelen CM, Orgill DP, Serena TE, et al. An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow-up trial [J]. Int Wound J, 2018, 15(5): 731-739.
[7]
Guyton GP. Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2001, 22(10):779-787.
[8]
Heller L, Levin LS. Lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001, 15;108(4):1029-1041; quiz 1042.
[9]
Heitmann C, Levin LS. The orthoplastic approach for management of the severely traumatized foot and ankle [J]. J Trauma, 2003, 54(2):379-390.
[10]
May JW Jr, Rohrich RJ. Foot reconstruction using free microvascular muscle flaps with skin grafts [J]. Clin Plast Surg, 1986, 13(4):681-689.
[11]
梁尊鸿,潘云川,林师帅. 胫后动脉穿支皮瓣接力修复足踝部及皮瓣供区软组织缺损[J]. 中华显微外科杂志2018, 41(5): 490-492.
[12]
Kozusko SD, Liu X, Riccio CA, et al. Selecting a free flap for soft tissue coverage in lower extremity reconstruction [J]. Injury, 2019, 50 Suppl 5: S32-S39.
[13]
Demirtas Y, Neimetzade T, Kelahmetoglu O, et al. Comparison of free muscle and perforator skin flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of the foot and ankle [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2010, 31(1): 53-58.
[14]
Baumeister S, Follmar KE, Zenn MR, et al. Strategy for reoperative free flaps after failure of a first flap [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008, 122(3): 962-971.
[15]
Grishkevich VM. Ankle dorsiflexion postburn scar contractures: anatomy and reconstructive techniques [J]. Burns, 2012, 38(6):882-888.
[16]
Bordianu A, Bobircǎ F, Pǎtraşcu T. Skin Grafting in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Soft Tissue Defects [J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2018, 113(5): 644-650.
[17]
Taylor BC, Triplet JJ, Wells M. Split-Thickness Skin Grafting: A Primer for Orthopaedic Surgeons [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021, 29(20): 855-861.
[18]
Hu Z, Zhu J, Cao X, et al. Composite Skin Grafting with Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Scaffold for Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2016, 222(6): 1171-1179.
[19]
Kim YH, Hwang KT, Kim KH, et al. Application of acellular human dermis and skin grafts for lower extremity reconstruction [J]. J Wound Care, 2019, 28(Sup4): S12-S17.
[20]
álvaro-Afonso FJ, García-álvarez Y, Lázaro-Martínez JL et al. Advances in Dermoepidermal Skin Substitutes for Diabetic Foot Ulcers [J]. Curr Vasc Pharmacol, 2020, 18(2): 182-192.
[21]
Walters J, Cazzell S, Pham H, et al. Healing Rates in a Multicenter Assessment of a Sterile, Room Temperature, Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Conventional Care Wound Management and an Active Comparator in the Treatment of Full-Thickness Diabetic Foot Ulcers [J]. Eplasty, 2016, 16: e10.
[22]
Tork S, Jefferson RC, Janis JE. Acellular Dermal Matrices: Applications in Plastic Surgery [J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2019, 33(3): 173-184.
[23]
Morimoto N, Yoshimura K, Niimi M, et al. Novel collagen/gelatin scaffold with sustained release of basic fibroblast growth factor: clinical trial for chronic skin ulcers [J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2013, 19(17/18): 1931-1940.
[24]
Nazempour M, Mehrabani D, Mehdinavaz-Aghdam R, et al. The effect of allogenic human Wharton′s jelly stem cells seeded onto acellular dermal matrix in healing of rat burn wounds [J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020, 19(4): 995-1001.
[25]
Cottler PS, Olenczak JB, Ning B, et al. Fenestration Improves Acellular Dermal Matrix Biointegration: An Investigation of Revascularization with Photoacoustic Microscopy [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(4): 971-981.
[1] 张健, 刘小龙, 查天建, 姚俊杰, 王傑. 富含血小板血浆联合异种脱细胞真皮基质修复糖尿病足缺血性创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 503-506.
[2] 刘江涛, 王一勇, 欧阳容兰, 黄书润. 采用改良胸脐带蒂皮瓣修复手腕背部深度创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 321-325.
[3] 王雪, 程微, 苏建东. 微针法表皮移植应用的新进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 270-273.
[4] 杨润功. 重视国家军队重大医疗需求以推动创面修复科快速发展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 191-196.
[5] 陆树良. 重视创面修复学科的规范化建设和理论培训[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 188-190.
[6] 黄跃生. 努力建设高水平创面修复新学科[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 185-187.
[7] 肖仕初. 微型皮移植的创新与应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 184-184.
[8] 李芳, 李全, 曹胜军, 王凌峰. 生长因子和细胞因子在创面修复过程中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 174-179.
[9] 李晓光, 周杰玉, 刘凯, 火子榕, 谭皓月, 何悦, 张治华, 王振涛, 汪照炎. 拉杆式皮肤扩展器在股前外侧皮瓣术后缺损中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 144-147.
[10] 王铄链, 刘毅, 胡智瀚. 负压伤口疗法的作用、机制及其在糖尿病足临床治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 69-72.
[11] 王睿甲, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 王宏宇. 间充质干细胞外泌体在创面修复相关信号通路中的作用研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 440-444.
[12] 王凌峰, 李全, 曹胜军, 周彪. 我国大面积烧伤救治工作的回顾与展望[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 369-378.
[13] 陈泽群, 褚万立, 申传安, 祝红娟, 叶祥柏, 王星童, 赵帆, 张路, 宋垚垚. 坏死性软组织感染的临床特征及应用综合序贯诊疗策略的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 300-307.
[14] 韩飞, 张万福, 胡晓龙, 佟琳, 官浩. 脱细胞异体真皮联合自体刃厚皮修复大面积烧伤后关节部位瘢痕挛缩[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 221-226.
[15] 中国生物材料学会烧创伤创面修复材料分会, 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会, 黄跃生, 黄海华, 罗奇志, 张逸. 三级与二级医院创面修复科基本配置标准的专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 195-197.
阅读次数
全文


摘要