切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 300 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.04.004

论著

坏死性软组织感染的临床特征及应用综合序贯诊疗策略的临床效果
陈泽群1, 褚万立1,(), 申传安1, 祝红娟1, 叶祥柏1, 王星童1, 赵帆1, 张路1, 宋垚垚1   
  1. 1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心烧伤整形医学部
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-23 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 褚万立
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82102320); 解放军总医院军事医学青年专项(QNC19039); 解放军总医院科技创新苗圃基金项目(18KMM45)

Clinical characteristics of necrotizing soft tissue infection and the clinical effect of comprehensive sequential diagnosis and treatment strategy

Zequn Chen1, Wanli Chu1,(), Chuanan Shen1, Hongjuan Zhu1, Xiangbai Ye1, Xingtong Wang1, Fan Zhao1, Lu Zhang1, yaoyao Song1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2022-04-23 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Wanli Chu
引用本文:

陈泽群, 褚万立, 申传安, 祝红娟, 叶祥柏, 王星童, 赵帆, 张路, 宋垚垚. 坏死性软组织感染的临床特征及应用综合序贯诊疗策略的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 300-307.

Zequn Chen, Wanli Chu, Chuanan Shen, Hongjuan Zhu, Xiangbai Ye, Xingtong Wang, Fan Zhao, Lu Zhang, yaoyao Song. Clinical characteristics of necrotizing soft tissue infection and the clinical effect of comprehensive sequential diagnosis and treatment strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(04): 300-307.

目的

探讨坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)病例的临床特征,及对其采取综合序贯诊疗策略后的临床治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析解放军总医院第四医学中心烧伤整形医学部烧伤科三病区2016年1月至2021年5月采用综合序贯诊疗策略[包括早期及时诊断、全身治疗、尽快清创、反复清创结合持续负压创面治疗联合灌洗(NPWTi)、序贯性封闭创面]治疗的NSTI患者病例资料。收集并分析患者的临床特征,包括一般资料(性别、年龄、糖尿病史、病因、创面部位等)、创面感染病原菌和NSTI分型;统计患者的治疗资料,包括患者出院时创面愈合情况(治愈、好转、未愈),截肢/趾情况,结肠造瘘情况,治愈患者的手术次数、NPWTi治疗时间、住院时间。

结果

本研究共纳入分析NSTI患者45例,其中男34例,女11例;年龄1.0~82.0岁,平均年龄(52.4±16.2)岁;23例(51.11%)患者既往有2型糖尿病病史;按照病因分类,其中疖、带状疱疹等导致的皮肤感染13例,压力性损伤8例,外伤7例,糖尿病足4例,蚊虫叮咬伤4例,针灸后感染2例,药物注射后感染1例,术后感染1例,肠道吻合口瘘1例,肛周脓肿1例,病因不明3例;按照创面始发部位分类,其中四肢21例,躯干部13例,会阴部6例,颈部5例。45例患者中,34例患者创面病原菌培养阳性,共培养菌株58株,其中金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌各8株,大肠杆菌和鲍曼不动杆菌各7株,铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯杆菌各4株,白色念珠菌1株,其他细菌共19株。NSTI 1型患者23例(67.65%),2型患者10例(29.41%),4型患者1例(2.94%)。NSTI 2型患者中,6例为金黄色葡萄球菌感染,4例为A群溶血性链球菌感染,包括2例化脓性链球菌感染和2例星座链球菌感染。1例4型患者感染真菌为白色念珠菌。45例患者中,37例患者治愈,5例患者经综合序贯治疗后病情好转提前离院,3例患者院内死亡(其中1例为转入ICU后死亡),院内病死率6.67%。2例患者行小腿中下段截肢治疗,1例患者行截趾治疗。5例患者行结肠造瘘手术。治愈患者平均手术次数为(4.2±2.0)次;平均NPWTi治疗时间为(45.5±31.7) d;平均住院时间为(63.6±39.5) d。

结论

本研究中,NSTI患者以中老年群体为主,且男性患者多于女性患者,糖尿病可能是NSTI发生的危险因素,常见发病部位依次是四肢、躯干、会阴部和颈部,最常见的病原菌主要包括金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、大肠杆菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯杆菌等,创面病原菌阳性NSTI患者以1型和2型为主,应用综合序贯诊疗策略,能够对NSTI治疗起到较好的临床治疗效果。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) and the clinical therapeutic effect of comprehensive sequential diagnosis and treatment strategy.

Methods

The clinical medical records of NSTI patients treated with comprehensive sequential diagnosis and treatment strategies in the Third Ward of Senior Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2016 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The comprehensive sequential diagnosis and treatment strategies included prompt diagnosis, systemic therapy, early and repeated debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy with instillation( NPWTi) and sequential wound closing. The clinical characteristics including general data (gender, age, history of diabetes, etiology, wound site, etc.), pathogenic bacteria of wound infection and type of NSTI were collected. The treatment data of patients including the wound healing situation (cured, improved or unhealed), amputation situation, colostomy or not, and the number of operations, the NPWTi treatment time and the hospitalization time of cured patients were counted.

Results

Totally 45 patients were included, with 34 males and 11 females, aged 1.0- 82.0 years with an average age of (52.4 ± 16.2) years; 23 patients (51.11%) had a history of type 2 diabetes. According to the etiological classification, there were 13 cases of skin infection caused by furuncle and herpes zoster, 8 cases of pressure injury, 7 cases of trauma, 4 cases of diabetic foot, 4 cases of insect bite, 2 cases of infection after acupuncture, 1 case of infection after drug injection, 1 case of postoperative infection, 1 case of intestinal anastomotic fistula, 1 case of perianal abscess, and 3 cases of unknown etiology. According to the initial site of the wound, there were 21 cases of limbs, 13 cases of trunk, 6 cases of perineum and 5 cases of neck. Thirty-four patients had positive wound pathogen culture in 45 patients, in which 58 bacterial strain were cultivated, including 8 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 8 strains of Enterococcus faecalis, 7 strains of Escherichia coli, 7 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, 4 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1 strain of Candida albicans, and 19 strains of other bacteria. There were 23 cases (67.65%) of type-1 NSTI patients, 10 cases (29.41%) of type-2 NSTI in which 6 cases were Staphylococcus aureus infections and 4 cases were group A hemolytic streptococcal infections including 2 cases of Streptococcus pyogenes infection and 2 cases of Streptococcus constellations infection, and 1 case (2.94%) of type-4 NSTI which is Candida albicans infection. Among the 45 patients, 37 patients were cured, 5 patients left the hospital in advance after comprehensive sequential treatment, and 3 patients died (one of them died after being transferred to ICU), the hospital mortality was 6.67%. Two patients received amputation of the middle and lower leg, and 1 patient received toe amputation. Five patients received colostomy. The average operation times of cured patients was (4.2±2.0) times, the average NPWTi treatment time was (45.5 ± 31.7) d, and the average length of stay in hospital was (63.6 ± 39.5) d.

Conclusions

In this study, NSTI patients were mainly middle-aged and elderly people, and more men than women. Diabetes may be a risk factor for NSTI. The original wound sites were extremity, trunk, perinaeum and neck in turn. The most common pathogens mainly included Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, etc. NSTI patients with positive wound pathogens were mainly type 1 and type 2. The application of comprehensive sequential diagnosis and treatment strategy can play a good clinical effect on the treatment of NSTI.

图1 综合序贯诊疗策略治疗NSTI患者1例。A示患者入院后查体见左臀部、左大腿共计3处创面,创周可见皮肤坏死,创面深及肌肉层,有大量皮肤及软组织坏死;B、C示2016年9月14日第1次清创手术,术中见左臀部及左下肢皮肤、筋膜、肌肉广泛坏死,术中彻底去除坏死组织至创面相对清洁;D示2016年9月18日第2次清创手术前见创面相对清洁,组织间隙内可见少量坏死组织;E示2016年9月30日第5次清创手术见创面清洁,无明显坏死组织;F示2016年10月17日第8次清创手术使用拉网中厚皮片覆盖残余创面;G示2016年11月8日见创面基本愈合,残余少量散在创面及原始肠道吻合口瘘窦道周围少量创面;H示2017年1月4日复查见左下肢创面愈合良好,无复发,原始肠道吻合口瘘窦道周围创面基本愈合;I示2017年5月31日随访见创面完全愈合,无复发;NSTI为坏死性软组织感染
[1]
Sartelli M, Guirao X, Hardcastle TC, et al. 2018 WSES/SIS-E consensus conference: recommendations for the management of skin and soft-tissue infections[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2018, 13: 58.
[2]
Hua C, Bosc R, Sbidian E, et al. Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 5(5): CD011680.
[3]
Cocanour CS, Chang P, Huston JM, et al. Management and Novel Adjuncts of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2017, 18(3): 250-272.
[4]
Harbrecht BG, Nash NA. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Review[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2016, 17(5): 503-509.
[5]
Endorf FW, Klein MB, Mack CD, et al. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections: differences in patients treated at burn centers and non-burn centers[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2008, 29(6): 933-938.
[6]
Bonne SL, Kadri SS. Evaluation and Management of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2017, 31(3): 497-511.
[7]
May AK. Skin and soft tissue infections[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2009, 89(2): 403-420, viii.
[8]
Jung N, Eckmann C. Essentials in the management of necrotizing soft-tissue infections[J]. Infection, 2019, 47(4): 677-679.
[9]
Stevens DL, Bryant AE. Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 377(23): 2253-2265.
[10]
崔瀛书,李怡,代站站,等. 坏死性软组织感染的诊治[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(5): 374-379.
[11]
El-Qushayri AE, Khalaf KM, Dahy A, et al. Fournier′s gangrene mortality: A 17-year systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2020, 92: 218-225.
[12]
Esposito S, Bassetti M, Concia E, et al. Diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). A literature review and consensus statement: an update[J]. J Chemother, 2017, 29(4): 197-214.
[13]
李峰,尹会男,胡泉,等. 宏基因组学第二代测序技术在烧伤患者和急慢性创面患者病原体检测中的应用[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2021, 37(8): 764-769.
[14]
Zacharias N, Velmahos GC, Salama A, et al. Diagnosis of necrotizing soft tissue infections by computed tomography[J]. Arch Surg, 2010, 145(5): 452-455.
[15]
Hayeri MR, Ziai P, Shehata ML, et al. Soft-Tissue Infections and Their Imaging Mimics: From Cellulitis to Necrotizing Fasciitis[J]. Radiographics, 2016, 36(6): 1888-1910.
[16]
Wong CH, Khin LW, Heng KS, et al. The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections[J]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32(7): 1535-1541.
[17]
Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, et al. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination, Imaging, and LRINEC Score: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(1): 58-65.
[18]
Johnson LJ, Crisologo PA, Sivaganesan S, et al. Evaluation of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score for detecting necrotizing soft tissue infections in patients with diabetes and lower extremity infection[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2021, 171: 108520.
[19]
Eguia E, Vivirito V, Cobb AN, et al. Predictors of Death in Necrotizing Skin and Soft Tissue Infection[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43(11): 2734-2739.
[20]
Gelbard RB, Ferrada P, Yeh DD, et al. Optimal timing of initial debridement for necrotizing soft tissue infection: A Practice Management Guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, 85(1): 208-214.
[21]
Nawijn F, Smeeing DPJ, Houwert RM, et al. Time is of the essence when treating necrotizing soft tissue infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2020, 15: 4.
[22]
Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Constantine T, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: International consensus guidelines update[J]. Int Wound J, 2020, 17(1): 174-186.
[23]
陶克,胡大海,朱雄翔,等. 复杂皮肤软组织缺损合并坏死性筋膜炎的综合治疗[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2012, 7(4): 409-413.
[24]
Capobianco CM, Stapleton JJ, Zgonis T. Soft tissue reconstruction pyramid in the diabetic foot[J]. Foot Ankle Spec, 2010, 3(5): 241-248.
[25]
高秋芳,牛雪涛,马彬,等. 股前外侧带蒂皮瓣修复坏死性筋膜炎所致会阴部皮肤软组织缺损的效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2020, 36(8): 738-742.
[26]
Burnham JP, Kollef MH. Treatment of severe skin and soft tissue infections: a review[J]. Curr Opin Infect Dis, 2018, 31(2):113-119.
[1] 张健, 刘小龙, 查天建, 姚俊杰, 王傑. 富含血小板血浆联合异种脱细胞真皮基质修复糖尿病足缺血性创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 503-506.
[2] 陆美琪, 赵洁, 单菲, 王兴蕾, 姜笃银. 药物相关坏疽性脓皮病的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 447-450.
[3] 刘江涛, 王一勇, 欧阳容兰, 黄书润. 采用改良胸脐带蒂皮瓣修复手腕背部深度创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 321-325.
[4] 杨润功. 重视国家军队重大医疗需求以推动创面修复科快速发展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 191-196.
[5] 陆树良. 重视创面修复学科的规范化建设和理论培训[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 188-190.
[6] 黄跃生. 努力建设高水平创面修复新学科[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 185-187.
[7] 王雪, 程微, 苏建东. 微针法表皮移植应用的新进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 270-273.
[8] 肖仕初. 微型皮移植的创新与应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 184-184.
[9] 李芳, 李全, 曹胜军, 王凌峰. 生长因子和细胞因子在创面修复过程中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 174-179.
[10] 李晓光, 周杰玉, 刘凯, 火子榕, 谭皓月, 何悦, 张治华, 王振涛, 汪照炎. 拉杆式皮肤扩展器在股前外侧皮瓣术后缺损中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 144-147.
[11] 翟延荣, 朱亚萍, 张秀珍, 钟晓娟, 鲁香月, 张雨凡, 陆树良. 比较新型硅橡胶负压冲洗引流系统与聚氨酯负压引流系统体外防堵塞性能的观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 116-122.
[12] 徐庆连. 下肢严重车祸伤创面修复的经验、教训[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 92-92.
[13] 王铄链, 刘毅, 胡智瀚. 负压伤口疗法的作用、机制及其在糖尿病足临床治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 69-72.
[14] 许月芳, 张辉, 曾妙甜, 朱自满. 坏死性筋膜炎病例特征及感染病原菌分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 564-567.
[15] 赵键, 孙法同, 邢宝杰, 王勇, 吕琳, 于雪淳, 王海滨, 贾代良. 肢体坏死性筋膜炎的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 87-91.
阅读次数
全文


摘要